Friday, May 27, 2011

Remember

This weekend we remember loved ones who have died,  especially those who served their country through military service. As we begin the 150th Anniversary of Civil War,we call to mind the many who have died protecting  and preserving our freedoms. We are grateful to those who are serving in Afghanistan and Iraq and offer our prayers  for  those  who lost  loved ones in  these wars. We also remember those  who have returned home with severe disabilities.

This is also the time   of year when many pastors who faithfully served their congregations (and may I say their country and communities through dedicated  service) are retiring. Many have  served  in unnoticed  ways; in smaller churches, with little recognition. I give thanks for their committed  service as I remember  pastors who influenced  my life: Pastor Hartman, Rev. Whitby, Rev. Gilbert who live now with the saints triumphant.
For all those who serve us in many ways ...may we remember and give thanks this weekend.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Management in a New Age

Gary Hamel in a short video http://bit.ly/jdRP9H states  that while modern management is one of the greatest innovations in the last century, it is not sufficient to meet the demands of today or the future. Modern management was about getting the most  out of people to make a profit.Today the need is to develop the full potential of  individuals.  In the church do we use people to fill positions and do jobs or do we help them develop their God given gifts?

Hamel says the future belongs  to companies and organizations that are adaptive, innovative, and inspiring. The challenge is to change as  fast as change itself, to see that innovation is the work of everyone , and bring the gift of creativity and passion to everything we do! They aspire to be the best, to challenge dogma (way things are done), and to  learn from the 'fringe'.

How well is your church prepared for the future?

Friday, March 25, 2011

Differing Views


Rob Bell’s (of the popular Nooma series) new book, Love Wins, has caused some major discussion and controversy in the evangelical church world. His book came from a comment on a note from a church member placed on a painting of Gandhi displayed during a church art event. The comment implied that Gandhi was in hell; to which Bell responded “who says so?” He has been criticized and even called heretic by some that he believes in universalism. For many of you this is not a controversy, but I raise it because many times in the church we have difficulty talking about difficult issues and allowing for differing viewpoints.

Recently Linnea Nilsen Capshaw  led a PRC workshop on equipping church members for ministry in the church and in the world. She referenced the book The Critical Journey: Stages in the Life of Faith. The book suggests that in Christian faith formation between the journey inward (stage 4) and the journey outward (stage 5) there comes a “Wall”, a time when a person struggles with unanswered questions and doubts. She shared that in the journey of faith many persons hit a wall with the questions, doubts, and struggles, but often the church does not provide the space or opportunity for the persons to break through the wall.

Many churches are facing difficult decisions about church life and faith—from what kind of worship should we have, what stays in or out of budget—to issues of lifestyles and sexual orientation. We speak about safe sanctuary for children (and it is important) but do we also have safe places for persons to discuss difficult topics and issues without our faith or commitment being questioned?

Lent is to be a time of reflection—remembering 40 days when Jesus was challenged about his faith. Perhaps if we allow Lent to be a time for questions asked, doubts expressed, and differing opinions allowed and appreciated… at the end of Lent we will find ‘new life’ within ourselves and our churches.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Team Playing & Looking Good on Paper


Pat Guillick ,adviser to the Philadelphia Phillies, recently said that the 2011 Phillies are a better team ON PAPER than his 2001 Seattle Mariners that won 116 games. Plans can look good on paper, but they need to be executed well by  the team to be effective and successful.

The recent Phillies teams have had success because they played well as a team; one person picking up when another player was struggling. They were a team that enjoyed being together, played hard, and had fun too. They also had a leader, manager, that they respected.

Your team in the church or at work can have ‘star’ players or persons with great ability, but if they do not work well together as team, the results can be less than effective and successful. Tom Rainer and Eric Geiger in their book “Simple Church” noted that  large churches that had ‘star’ staff members , but who were not a unified team behind a clear purpose,  ultimately did not do well in the long run.

An old saying goes, if you fail to plan, you plan to fail. But you if your team is not united, does not work together toward a common purpose and execute the plan, then the  plan only ‘looks good’ on paper.  

Monday, February 21, 2011

Leadership in Time of Conflict and Change


Today we celebrate Presidents Day especially remembering George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. Both were great leaders at crucial times in our nation’s history. Washington led the nation in its infancy bringing together 13 colonies- new sovereign states- to form a union. Moving from monarchy to democracy – from separate colonies to a unified nation was no easy task. Lincoln had to lead a divided nation in the midst of a major conflict.

Leading in a time of change and conflict is difficult to say the least. John Kotter, former Harvard Business School Professor, writes there are  key factors in leading in a time of crisis and change. In such times, a leader needs to remain focused on the goal. Both Washington and Lincoln were focused on the goal of  united states’ in America.

Both Washington and Lincoln knew there was as urgency about their task; waiting too long would result in failure to unite or reunite a nation. While both were  strong individuals, they  knew how to build a team around them.  Lincoln did care for some of his generals personally, but he knew they were great military leaders and could win battles. Both men empowered their team to use their skills to mold a nation

Lincoln and Washington had a vision for a strong nation based on democratic principles and both would help to communicate that vision to the people as Lincoln did so masterfully in the Gettysburg Address. (I recently viewed a documentary on Lincoln that detailed how he used the technology of his day – the newspapers- to articulate his views as he ran for the Republican nomination. The press would print his speeches so that thousands read what only a few hundred would hear him say in person- his Tweet/Facebook.)

Generating short term wins helps people to believe in the direction you are leading.  Washington had to confront the Whiskey Rebellion in order to establish the right of the federal government to tax.

Both leaders would not let up. They fought the temptation to give into the negative and remained focused on their mission. They worked to make the change stick. Before he was assassinated, Lincoln already was working on ways to bring the southern states back into the fold of the union—something that many resisted and almost caused the successful   impeachment of Andrew Johnson.

Friday, February 11, 2011

The Up Rising














Like you, I have been watching the historic events in Egypt. The commitment, courage, and calm of the demonstrators has been inspiring. It got me to thinking. Would I be willing to take such a courageous stand? If so,what would be the cause? Yes, I have written to congress, signed petitions, but would I stand for a week in the city square for a cause  unsure of safety and the outcome?

Mubarak 's desire to keep control and his unwillingness to deal with the demonstrations has weaken his ability to lead effective change in his country. When my position or views are challenged, how do I respond? Become defensive, ignore the opposition, fight?

While what we may face in opposition pales in comparison to what the Egyptians are facing, there are lessons to be learned. Several key values are important in  challenging and chaotic situations/times.  1) Be clear about you purpose/mission. The demonstrators are  clear about their purpose and mission. 2) Be willing to dialogue -speak, but also listen. (Something Mubarak  was unable to do effectively.)   Not every challenge that comes your way is valid, but that will only become clear if there is dialogue. 3) Patience and calm are strong virtues and give strength to resolve. 4) Have the courage to stand firm ,weather,  and face the opposition for the long haul; too often it is easier to give in or give up.

What thoughts do you have ?

PS As  I post  this Mubarak has left the Capital and turned power over to the Army